A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy š
If your post meets the following criteria, itās welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
- 0 users online
- 260 users / day
- 969 users / week
- 2.46K users / month
- 5.6K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 3.07K Posts
- 119K Comments
- Modlog
Iāve become anarcho-communist in my political beliefs and value system. It took being in disability for 8 years after a serious mental health episode that made me start to become more of a humanist. The ample evidence of the problems of society due to capitalism and the widening wealth and resource gap pushed me very far to the left. I think I became a better person through my turnoil. I started understanding that we need to live for each other in addition to ourselves. The notion of bootstrapping is essentially a myth.
Ok far-left extremist
No one should be poor. No exceptions.
My stint in poverty wasnāt even that bad. Sure, I had $40 for food and gas for two weeks while the soles literally fell out of my shoes and off my feet while working in a hot kitchen for several years. But I wasnāt a migrant, legal or otherwise. I had an okay upbringing, and didnāt have trauma cut my future before it even started. I was never homeless. And so on.
Nonetheless, I felt taken advantage of over time. Eventually, the restaurant I worked at moved to a new location with me, gave me a rise to $10 per hr, which was huge to me, and then cut my hours in half. I had to get another job after helping these people through so much. I was one of the original employees at that location and was pushed out by management.
So, there was one burning question in my mind: why was I pushed out? But the question transformed into āWhy did I have to go through that at all?ā
One of the reasons I got an economics degree is to understand the most popular answers deeply. People are poor because they donāt work hard enough, theyāre unskilled or low-skilled, government is taking your money, etc.
All of it is bullshit. All of it. Every last trash excuse that justifies poverty is a lie. Neoclassical economics is a theory of selfishness and misanthropy.
Poverty is a policy choice. Poverty, by America, by Matthew Desmond, is an excellent book about this. We give tax breaks for people owning second homes, for example. What else could the money collected from owners of second homes do for social policy? Reagan cut corporate taxes. But, if those taxes were higher, how could the money be used to alleviate poverty?
Essentially, I lived poverty, tried to understand why I endured it, and came up empty. Thereās no reason other than selfishness why I endured it. And the same is true of everybody in poverty today around the entire world.
āTry not to be a dickā is probably the most base but somehow most meaningful phrase Iāve ever heard and I try to live by it. Sure there is a lot more to me and things go a lot deeper but I feel if everyone at least attempted to adhere to it then who knows what things might be like.
Yeah itās insane how much time I spent reading about ethics and shit, and then have ādonāt be a dickā be one of main driving factors in my decision making.
You know what? It works just fine.
āNever trust a fart.ā This phrase has inspired healthy skepticism ever since it was coined by Abraham Lincoln.
I used to get frustrated with people very easily, and honestly I still do, but Iāve gotten much better at keeping my cool. I canāt think of any specific moment or anything that brought me here, but at some point I realized that getting angry and blowing up at somebody just doesnāt do anybody any good. Like even looking at it from a completely selfish perspective, shouting at somebody over an annoyance isnāt going to help me with anything at all, and in fact itās likely to just make the situation worse. Itās been long enough that I donāt really even feel tempted to anymore.
Another thing is like⦠I used to lean much more conservative until I eventually realized that itās just rather self-destructive. I never bought into the more extreme stuff like believing certain ethnicities are inherently, genetically inferior to others, but to put it simply for a while I was convinced that things like feminism and environmentalism were going to ātake stuff away from me.ā Not even on some grand scale of like destroying western civilization or whatever people like to say these days, but just that I as an individual would be less likely to succeed and get rich or whatever.
I was more libertarian-ish in college, and I think it was all the battles for net neutrality around 2013-2015 or so that finally got me to realize that a complete lack of government oversight would be untenable for anyone who isnāt already wealthy. From there, especially as the online right started getting louder and crazier, I started to figure out that the same people whoād been āwarningā me and other sad nerds like me about feminism and whatever were the only ones who were actually trying to force people to do anything. Most people just want to exist, man. Theyāre not trying to push some agenda on everyone else, they just wanna live their damn lives.
As for the environmentalism bit, yeah I only ever ādoubtedā climate change because I thought trying to prevent it was gonna stop me from getting rich and having a fancy car and shit. I always knew it was real, I just wanted to not care and be all belligerent about it. And no, of course I didnāt have a plan for how I was gonna get rich lmao, I was a dumb, selfish kid.
Now I know Iāll never get rich no matter what I do and weāre all gonna die in a climate disaster anyway, so whatever lol.I dunno how much I can say any of this guides or inspires me, but I do feel like Iāve become a better person at least, somehow.
People like to say that as you get older, you become more conservative. Itās been the exact opposite for me and I have my parents to thank. They never pushed political or religious bullshit on me, but I saw their humanist accepting personalities and it shaped me more than either of them ever knew.
Iāve gotten more confident in my views and try to convey that the only way to survive is as a working class collective that doesnāt fall for political theater like we constantly see today. Itās lead me to be more supportive of others at work, to be more nuanced, and itās helped me become a better leader and teacher.
Itās helped me settle into who I actually am and has allowed me to better tune out the constant noise from people that canāt help but cheer on political demagogues and their pointless nonsense.
I tend to tutor people randomly. Siblings mostly, sometimes friends, occasionally strangers. It makes me feel good. I get a pretty strong shot of vicarious triumph when I help them achieve a goal.
And I would always hear the same things from people who struggled.
āIām just not good at thisā I would hear.
āI suck at mathā would be pretty common too.
This was never spoken by people whose minds were actually incapable of comprehension. Each and every one of them proved smart enough to perform what they deemed an impossible task. But in order to instill the confidence necessary to make it through the problems, I always had to set them straight, open their minds to the possibility that they were wrong about themselves.
At first it seemed kind of inspirational: āno one is too stupid to accomplish their goals,ā you know? But after it happened enough times, I started to feel like I was some brain surgeon pulling the same damn tumor out of patient after patient, skull after skull. It was a fucking epidemic of self-doubt so strong it literally affected peopleās entire life trajectory.
At some point, unrelated to tutoring, I wound up chatting with a stranger who had just walked out of some, āDonald Trumpās key to successā kind of conference that had taken place on my campus. (It was like, 2013. I didnāt know who Donald Trump was back then.) He asked me a few questions. My answers impressed him, and he called me āsmart.ā
And I hated him instantly.
The second that word came out of his mouth, a wave of distrust and enmity washed over me, and I felt like he was trying to scam me. Mind you, I am a 5ā11" 180lb man. Itās not like he was practicing pickup on me. It was almost-certainly an attempt at practicing the ānetworkingā skills he picked up from the conference he just attended. And the only reason it didnāt play well to his audience was because I hated the word āsmartā and hated anyone who believed in the concept.
And then, some years later, I was able to finally articulate it after someone chastised me online for calling my own actions stupid ā for using, as a commenter described it, āan ableist slur.ā Boy did the pieces click together after that.
This is going to seem crazy, but ladies, gentlemen, esteemed in-betweens: there is so such thing as āstupid.ā There never was.
The human brain is a miraculous thing. It can literally rewire itself if it needs to. With the right techniques, a brain can even be induced to repair itself after certain kinds of strokes. Meaning if, hypothetically, one were āstupidā then the proper application of societal resources could actually turn that same person smart. Just like how I was able to tutor ābad at mathā students into āgood at mathā students.
Which is probably why Rockefeller and Carnegie were so keen on making everyone believe in the concept. Because what I just described is expensive, and if thereās a ceiling on a personās potential (like āstupidā), then that gives society a really good excuse to give up on that person before spending a dime.
āWeāre already doing all we can for these people.ā the well-intentioned steel monopolist tells you, āThey get every opportunity they need. The reason they struggle so much in this society? They just⦠arenāt that bright. They were just never capable of that much to begin with.ā
āStupidā is, in other words, a social Darwinist myth created by billionaires to abdicate responsibility for the poverty they were creating. And if someone expresses a belief in, āstupidā I know I cannot count on them. I hope to someday surround myself with people who despise the word and everything it stands for. Because those are the people I can trust to actually improve the world.
I have a masters degree in materials chemistry and engineering. When people find that out they often say stuff like āI could never understand thatā or similar.
I am of the firm belief that I could teach anyone everything I know given enough time and motivation. The thing is, I donāt think thereās anything special about me that makes me capable of doing what I do, other than thinking chemistry is extremely interesting. I donāt have a more capable brain or anything. Iām just a bit of a nerd.
I absolutely agree that way too many people have the misconception that you have to be āspecialā to do a lot of the things many people find hard. Itās all about being interested enough to spend time learning it.
Holy fuck, mega based take ya got there. Social darwinism is a bane to society, deeply rooted in capitalist thought and also loved by fascists for its eugenic undertones. People get fooled that itās somehow āscientificā because itās got darwinism in the name (and because of poor education) when itās nothing but pseudoscience. Same goes for the phrase āsurvival of the fittestā which is a social darwinist misinterpretation of Darwinās theories.
In a similar vein, I firmly believe that everyone is creative in some way. Most people are just unable to discover what their creative interests might be because of the pressures of (over)work, because art education is so goddamn expensive, and because creative industries are incredibly exclusive and elitist. And limiting creativity severely limits our imagination, making us good little cogs for the machine.
Hell yes to all of this! Any defense of capitalism requires social darwinism.
That is, if you can get someone to comprehend what ācapitalismā even is! I am astounded at how difficult it is to communicate the difference between a worker co-op and a privately owned business. To anyone!
Itās weird because it seems so obvious to me. Itās a difference in how the worker is treated. A difference in the dignity of their work. A whole different social contract.
I donāt know what combination of words I need to use to get them to see this! Itās so frustrating. How can they so easily understand the difference between a dictatorship and a representative republic, but not be able to extend that logic to how we run businesses? What kind of incredible social programming have robber barons performed on them?
Anyways, rant over for now. I agree that we are hobbled by overwork. I agree that our creativity is forcefully suppressed in order to make us better cogs. I just wish I could figure out how to spread the word.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=P4SDBVaUboc
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
Iām open-source, check me out at GitHub.
I find your comment interesting because you are implying that some people believe being stupid or clever is a permanent unchangeable state. Presumably one is born as either one or the other?
I would say that some ways of thinking are stupid. In particular when one does not challenge oneās assumptions. Itās possible to build a whole world of stupid on top of bad assumptions. If someoneās entire worldview is built in this way - a whole load of bad assumptions held together with poor logic and wishful thinking - I donāt think theyāre even living in the real world any more, theyāre living in a fantasy land.
Oh, yes. I am fine with the idea that every human ā regardless of their occupation or their results on an IQ test ā can engage in something that could be called āstupidity.ā
Absolutely everyone makes stupid mistakes. Absolutely everyone holds at least a few stupid beliefs.
But I also think when we encounter those aspects of a person, we can use better words to describe the concept. Words that donāt have a social darwinist connotation. Words that no one mistakes for āpermanent, unchangingā attributes.
Like: I donāt like Trump supporters, but āTrump supporters have an impressive resistance to information that might challenge their worldviewā is so much better than āfacts donāt work on them: Trump supporters canāt read.ā
The former describes a choice these people repeatedly make. The latter is immature name-calling.
And to be honest, my main gripe with conservatism in general isnāt even how its proponents handle information. (Everyone has to use heuristics to quickly estimate the reliability of a news article before believing the headline. They take as much issue with our heuristics as we take with theirs.)
My main gripe is that conservatism is a social darwinist philosophy at its core.
Giving up on people is practically the bedrock of modern conservatism. I would accuse them of being cruel before I would accuse them of being unable to read. I would accuse them of ignoring information that does not justify their cruelty before I would accuse them of being too stupid to process that information.
Shared spaces are everyoneās space and obligation. Trash or a tree branch on the road or sidewalk? Rather than ānot my concernā a mindset of āshared space, shared responsibility/free to clean upā mindset will serve everyone - and especially those not currently able to do so/that could be hindered by the obstacles.
āEveryoneā meaning every individual fully rather than split/miniscule parts.
Donāt lie. I hate lies, especially when people on my side lie. It just generally annoys me. Like someone insisting Ukraineās grain shipments werenāt going to rich countries mainly. Fucking shit, Putin is horrible enough, why do you need to make up things that even the UN disagrees with?
My secondary guiding principle is to not be an asshole, but that one only lasts as long as you are not the one violating either my primary or secondary principle first.
Donāt ever, for any reason, do anything to anyone for any reason ever, no matter what, no matter where, or who, or who you are with, or where you are going, or where youāve been⦠ever, for any reason whatsoeverā¦
-Michael Scott
Be excellent to each other and party on dudes. Itās a fun movie with a simple principle which I try to follow. Itās also a reminder to have fun and enjoy the little things. The world would be a much better place if everyone followed it.
So many to choose from :) I guess for today it will be⦠Shit happens.
Bad things can happen to you for no reason. You can agonize over it, wonder why, etc. Or you can accept that it happened, focus on dealing with the consequences and try to make the best out of it.
Itās not always easy, but I do feel it has made me more laid back and happier in general.
Edited because Thelsim doesnāt know how to proofread
Iām trying to be more kind. Normally, I tend to be analytical and abrupt. If someone is wrong, I try to demonstrate it a simply as possible and move on. If theyāre right, that is good, thereās no reason to celebrate; move on. I find most people donāt respond well to any of this, for their own reasons. So, Iām trying to set that aside and simply be more gentle when handling interactions with another person.
I do my best work when Iām empowering others.
Sure, I can take the spotlight and do some really cool things. But when I support others, for example by helping them figure out or achieve their goals, create opportunities, connect people, etc., then Iām helping add even more good to the world.
Almost all fights/arguments come out of misunderstandment. Itās not always misunderstanding the situation itself but what led the other person to this situation. Why is he/she saying this? Itās hard enough to also understand what a person is saying. But once you understand both, itās hard to be upset.
My other most important value; let others be others. You and everyone can do as you like as long as no one is forced into it as well. Example: someone going through abortion with a fetus not capable of feeling does not affect anyone since itās unknowing and the abortion itself doesnāt force others into a debate or partaking. However, denying the possibility of abortion will limit the person wanting abortion.
Edit: what brought me to this was just pure experience and socialization. My second girlfriend helped me get to the first point. The other one I guess my parents instilled.