Because it’s also only the size of about a small box, fits into my living room cupboard, and is quiet, passively cooled.
If you need a high-powered server, sure. But that tiny server is idling the majority of the time, and never even gets busy, we are only 2 people using it, and something like storage uses next to CPU resources.
And it’s not as if I waste my computer, I just ship of theseus it over the years.
$1000 could power this server for literally years
That really depends on a lot of things, including how recent and thus efficient it is. (Edit: For example, my computer right now, but with 2 27 WQHD attached, is already using 180W, the most power-draining thing I have opened is a twitch stream)
I upgraded from an RX 470 to an RX 6600 last year (only playing on WQHD though), for anything but action games, which I don’t like, that’s easily powerful enough. I’ll happily take better iGPU (lack of upgradability would require that to be really powerful, though), but I see no reason to stick them into a tiny case, if anything that would be a switch from midi-tower to mini-tower. After all, I still need space to connect everything. That works with me just having replaced my 2 last 3.5 HDDs (1TB + 0.5TB) with a single 2TB SSD.
I would, but in my rush to buy a cheap one (OnePlus Nord), I forgot to check. Luckily, it’s also rather rare I need them, so I bought some even cheaper Lenovo Pro in-ears from AliExpress for 8€ which, while annoying, are acceptable for what little I need. Luckily, my computer both has proper speakers and a headphone jack.
Part of the reason is that I generally hate having to charge things. My keyboard is wired, my mouse is wireless but permanently connected via a woven USB cable.
I don’t actually care about vertical tabs, perfectly happy with them being at the top. My taskbar makes sense to be vertical, I only need icons. But for tabs, I want the title text (besides a few pinned tabs), vertically that takes up way too much space.
Can’t speak much about some web app performance (which also has a chance of simply being chrome-optimized) as I don’t do much with complex web apps, preferring desktop software.
Firefox ever since Quantum which was when it finally became as performant as chrome for my usage again.
I used to check it out every 1-2 years in the hopes that it improved, and it was never good enough for me, before that.
It explained to me what that was, so I’m okay with it ;)