Modlog
TimemodAction
2h
mod
Banned @seedotrun@lemmy.world from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 4
1d
mod
Banned RoundSparrow @ .ee from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Ban evasion RoundSparrow@lemmy.ml
1d
mod
Removed Post Lemmy resource usage reason: Community rule 3
1d
mod
Removed Post Why did I find a white girl with a black baby doll so weird? reason: Rule 1
1d
mod
Removed Post How to mention a community on lemmy? reason: Community rule 3
2d
mod
Banned @SRo@lemmy.dbzer0.com from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 1, 2
2d
mod
Removed Comment It is a step in the right direction if someone comes to see the error of their thinking when they see how it effects the people they care about but does that mean they truly accept the broader idea of accepting and understanding? So often in my life i have had people who i thought would understand and be accepting or less prone to making harmful assumptions. However they end up just turning their backs on me assuming i am something that fits their warped view. Terfs, Tankies, People who on one hand believe in something good then support equal atrocities in the name of their supposed cause. I am probably just unlucky or cursed and i know that not everyone is like that but But simply being accepting of something doesn't mean they abandon all their other twisted views. I say all this as someone who has no friends and struggles to know if my small family the only people i interact with truly have my best interests. instead i am finding out they are all but blinded to how they are supporting causes that are apposed to the supportive nature they may put up. by @Vix@pawb.social reason: Rule 1
2d
mod
Banned @breadsmasher@lemmy.world from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 1, 2
2d
mod
Removed Post I know a millenial who just had their 4th grandchild ; ama? reason: c/asklemmy is not c/ama
2d
mod
Removed Comment More and more advertisements on here. Get the fuck out of here with your advertisements. by @demesisx@infosec.pub reason: Chill
4d
mod
Removed Post A Question reason: Community rule 3
5d
mod
Removed Post Clean Lemmy Instances reason: Rule 1
5d
mod
Removed Post Does David Hogg creep anyone else out? reason: Community rule 1, 2
5d
mod
Banned @johker216@lemmy.world from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 4
5d
mod
Removed Comment Just use gimp? Pathetic to simp for closed software like that by @space_iio@sopuli.xyz reason: don't be that guy
6d
mod
Removed Comment Is that a shitty attempt at a joke, or just you being an asshole? If it's the first, well, it didn't read as a joke, so you *look* like an asshole. If it was the second, feel free to block me, asshole. by southsamurai reason: Rule 2
6d
mod
Removed Post My friend keeps defending my dad, what should I do? reason: User is banned by own instance
6d
mod
Removed Comment You missed them mentioning they are a guy, so he needs to seduce his friend's mom. I guess he could seduce the friend, get her pregnant, leave her for the mom, get the mom pregnant, and then leave her for the dad. It would take some serious game to pull off and bisexuality, but he would really make a point. by @Death_Equity@lemmy.world reason: rule 2
6d
mod
Removed Comment > In all seriousness, what do I do? Stop talking to her? Talk to her? Be her friend despite it? Find her father, seduce him, become pregnant with his child, cause him to divorce his wife, forever remind your "friend" that you are her mother now, cut her out of the will, watch her become destitute, laugh at her as she ages prematurely from stress. by @mannycalavera@feddit.uk reason: rule 2
7d
mod
Banned @Aux@feddit.uk from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 1
7d
mod
Banned 张马修 from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 1, 2, 4
8d
mod
Removed Post People who knew someone that was murdered, what happened? reason: Self-doxxing honeypot
8d
mod
Banned @Lembot_0001@lemm.ee from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 1
9d
mod
Banned @Shardikprime@lemmy.world from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 1
9d
mod
Removed Comment Oops I absolutely did. I had this story open in another tab because I wanted to get back to it and read it after posting, and somehow crossed my wires. I'll fix it. by @PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat reason: Wrong thread
9d
mod
Removed Comment > Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, nominated by President Ronald Reagan, a Republican, wrote that he and his two colleagues “cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos.” Until I read this whole verdict, I hadn't realized why people were making a big deal about it. It's breathtaking. >>The basic differences between the branches mandate a serious effort at mutual respect. The respect that courts must accord the Executive must be reciprocated by the Executive’s respect for the courts. Too often today this has not been the case, as calls for impeachment of judges for decisions the Executive disfavors and exhortations to disregard court orders sadly illustrate. >>This is a losing proposition all around. The Judiciary will lose much from the constant intimations of its illegitimacy, to which by dint of custom and detachment we can only sparingly reply. The Executive will lose much from a public perception of its lawlessness and all of its attendant contagions. >> >>**The Executive may succeed for a time in weakening the courts, but over time history will script the tragic gap between what was and all that might have been, and law in time will sign its epitaph.** >> >>It is, as we have noted, all too possible to see in this case an incipient crisis, but it may present an opportunity as well. We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos. >> >>This case presents their unique chance to vindicate that value and to summon the best that is within us while there is still time. Whoever wrote that should get a medal made of gold. [Full text is in this post.](https://roberthubbell.substack.com/p/another-good-day-in-the-defense-of) by @PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat reason: Wrong thread
9d
mod
Banned @Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 1, 4
9d
mod
Removed Post Before i have any sort of reaction, does this user appear to be a troll or an actual child who acts this way? reason: Offtopic
9d
mod
Banned ✨🫐🌷🌱🌌🌠🌌🌿🪻🥭✨ from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 1
9d
mod
Removed Post When badguys kill "even the women and children" shouldn't that be MORE acceptable because it isn't discriminatory? reason: Rule 1
10d
mod
Removed Post China: Southeast Asia visit raises alarm over digital repression
10d
mod
Removed Post Chinese firm tied to Uyghur rights abuses now training Tibet police on hacking techniques reason:
10d
mod
Restored Post Chinese firm tied to Uyghur rights abuses now training Tibet police on hacking techniques
10d
mod
Removed Post Chinese firm tied to Uyghur rights abuses now training Tibet police on hacking techniques
11d
mod
Removed Post Anyone try storing your farts in jars and inhaling them when you need them? What's it like? reason: trolling; community rule 5
12d
mod
Banned @WuceBrillis@lemm.ee from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 1
12d
mod
Banned @demesisx@slrpnk.net from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 4
12d
mod
Banned @song00661@sh.itjust.works from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Spam acct
12d
mod
Removed Post I am North Korean who lives in NK AMA reason: Spam
13d
mod
Removed Comment There are some extreme cases I think most people could agree on, like some of the more serious diseases you mentioned. Racist/murderous eugenicists opearte on the opposite side of the spectrum. But what about traits in between that some people think are detrimental but others don't? I' not fundamentally disagreeing with you, just curious where you would draw the line and how you think that line should be socially determined and regulated? by @Disinformation_Bot@lemm.ee reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Removed Comment While I agree with this, US and to a lesser degree global politics is making a very good argument that easily available information has no impact on peoples ability to act responsibly. by @Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Removed Comment For starters, I think it should be something backed entirely by science with very little political involvement in the discussion. Following that, I think it should start strictly with things we can identify perfectly and from there should be strictly things that decrease the lifespan by more than 30 years or that totally prevent a normal standard of living. No one needs to be sterilized because they have glasses, but I'd argue that colorblindness should go given that we color code our infrastructure. Simultaneously we need to pair this with a cultural movement to glorify the idea of adoption and proactive sterilization while establishing a system to provide safe and curated ivf or surrogacy to those who can't ethically reproduce. It's not their fault they were born this way and their sacrifice is a heroic venture, they deserve to pass on their cultural lineage as much as anyone. by @Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Removed Comment I've considered this, it could be as simple as a cash reward if you have X trait and get sterilized. by @Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Removed Comment I think eugenics is bad if it gets taken too far. If you take it little steps at a time it will probably be ok. But if you do it too much so that you lose diversity then if one guy dies from a disease of some sort, everybody will eventually die by /home/pineapplelover reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Removed Comment Exactly, and that provides a great example as to how fucking stupid previous "eugenicists" are. Everyone talks shit on eugenics because Nazis pretended to believe in eugenics. by @Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Removed Comment Agree, and point well made. We selectively breed animals to weed out genetic problems and to encourage certain traits. But humans are doomed to self selection. by @LuckyPierre@lemm.ee reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Removed Comment Eugenics as a concept isn't bad, we just keep letting assholes pilot it. I firmly believe that it isn't ethical to bring a child into the world knowing it's going to have a condition that will effect it's quality of life severely and likely continue to do so for generations to come. We have the tech to predict, modify, and avoid tons of issues. We already do it regularly with Downs. It would take tragically little effort to do the same for things like sickle cell, psoriasis, color blindness, even some mental illnesses. It's only a problem because someone inevitably says, "that's brilliant! And while we're at it we can get rid of the Jews/blacks/gays/etc!" by @Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Removed Comment If you mean 18 and 19 year olds, you should probably say that instead of "sexually mature teen girls" by @Kacarott@aussie.zone reason: Cleanup
13d
mod
Removed Comment Sure, but these sorts of relationships are both less common and less frowned upon. The thread asked for one's most unpopular opinion. by @blarghly@lemmy.world reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Removed Comment I agree, but I'm surprised you didn't mention older women who target younger men. Everything is also applicable to them - lust is an equal opportunity employer. by @LuckyPierre@lemm.ee reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Removed Comment I mean, a further controversial opinion - the 18 year old cutoff is completely arbitrary. If we were somehow able to confer the ability to consent based on the maturity level of the individual, then the consent age of any given person might be lower, or might extend all the way to their death. In a small communal society where everyone has intimate knowledge of everyone else, this might be possible, and even preferred. But on the scale of nations, we need rules which are legible to courts, which means we say "the age of consent is X", and assume it covers most cases decently enough. by @blarghly@lemmy.world reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Unbanned @Joeyowlhouse@lemmy.wtf from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
13d
mod
Banned ZeroOne from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 1
13d
mod
Unbanned ZeroOne from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
14d
mod
Banned @TheSparrowPrince@lemmy.world from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 4
14d
mod
Banned @UnprovenMortality@discuss.online from the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 4
14d
mod
Removed Post Prompt: How would an AI win an Election? reason: cringe
14d
mod
Removed Post Tecno Camon 30 Gaming Performance Review: Can It Power Through the Heat? reason: spam?
15d
mod
Removed Post How do you create communities? reason: Community rule 3
16d
mod
Banned @FloranceSmith@szmer.info from the community Technology@beehaw.org
reason: Gore
2Y
mod
Locked Post Why can I no longer see media from lemmy.world?
2Y
mod
Appointed TheRtRevKaiser as a mod to the community Technology@beehaw.org
2Y
mod
Removed mint as a mod to the community Gaming@beehaw.org
2Y
mod
Locked Post The Problem with LMG
2Y
mod
Locked Post Why do you think people should or shouldn't know about the side effects of the COVID vaccine?
2Y
mod
Appointed Ada as a mod to the community Asklemmy@lemmy.ml
2Y
mod
Locked Post Share your migration story!
2Y
mod
Banned @Alicekelli@lemmy.cat
reason: spam
2Y
mod
Appointed @1993_toyota_camry@beehaw.org as a mod to the community Operating Systems@beehaw.org
2Y
mod
Appointed @Los@beehaw.org as a mod to the community Technology@beehaw.org
2Y
mod
Appointed @coldredlight@beehaw.org as a mod to the community Technology@beehaw.org
2Y
mod
Removed @ResidualBit@beehaw.org as a mod to the community Technology@beehaw.org
2Y
mod
Unstickied Post Megathread for Reddit Blackouts and News - Rest of the Week(?)
2Y
mod
Appointed rs5th as a mod to the community Technology@beehaw.org
2Y
mod
Removed rknuu as a mod to the community Technology@beehaw.org
2Y
mod
Stickied Post Federation, Defederation, and You - FAQ and Megathread
2Y
mod
Locked Post Reddit goes dark