This accusation and evidence is so flimsy and immaterial. These don’t look like ai generated images. They don’t have closed composition, they are off center, and the text looks good. They look like distant lod 3d models or maybe some concept art.

Vodulas [they/them]
link
fedilink
2
edit-2
5h

I don’t know if you and I looked at the same images. Other than the text, all of the images have a lot of hallmarks of AI. The car is asymmetrical in almost every aspect, the bridge has a lot of random artifacts where support cables would be, the skyscrapers are just nonsensical all over the place. To me, they look like a ton of AI slop. They might just be placeholder art, but still shitty to use AI generated images

Gamma
link
fedilink
35h

Did you mean “other than text?”

I just looked at the images in the article and I agree. I would hope they were placeholder, but that bridge especially has so many weird artifacts it almost looks like they used an older model to generate it

Yes, sorry, other than the text

coyotino [he/him]
creator
link
fedilink
16h

yeah i edited the headline because even that was kinda clickbaity for what essentially amounts to Nintendo saying “no”. But at least good to know Nintendo isn’t buying into the AI hypetrain?

I think that ‘no’ is likely a lie. Take a look at the images posted in the article. Pretty clearly AI imo

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it’s gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming’s sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 0 users online
  • 55 users / day
  • 225 users / week
  • 422 users / month
  • 800 users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.35K Posts
  • 18.9K Comments
  • Modlog