@yoz Most people aren’t idiots, they are uninformed. But they become an idiot ones you inform them… So most people are potential idiots. :D

@Gormadt They say Firefox is slow. Because in the past it used to, especially with the old engine and when Chrome was new, that’s true. But nowadays it does not matter anymore and the speed differences are negligible. If that is the only reason to not use Firefox, then people should reevaluate their decision.

Then there is the argument that people do not like Mozilla. But they like Google more? Even if you use a Chromium based browser by a different company, you give more power to Google this way, as the engine becomes a bigger part of the web. Am I crazy for thinking that?

I use Firefox since version 1 as my default. Occasionally I switched to a different browser, but always came back to good ol’ Firefox.

Nobody cares what Gamestop boss says, lol.

@Pons_Aelius We could migrate RedditMigration to a new “NeoRedditMigration”. :D

@Pons_Aelius I was reporting the posts previously, but gave up.d

deleted by creator

@Stillhart Clickbait works, sadly. So they won’t listen to you.

@MagicShel If everyone says Twitter, then it is less confusing then if some talk about X.

@TwilightVulpine Some games offer time limited events. Maybe you could argue with that?^^

@realcaseyrollins Are all maps remasters of the original MW2 maps? This game really doesn’t feel like a new game, but was originally planned as a Modern Warfare 2 Remake extension to add original maps. That they will include new maps in the future is another good reason to believe that. This shouldn’t be a new standalone game for full price.

@LufyCZ Did you even read what I wrote?

@Chozo The end of the video:

But Dbrand did offer

… is basically advertisement for the brand, packed into “a joke”. Why would they mention it otherwise?

@CorrodedCranium https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/pc/615805-the-elder-scrolls-v-skyrim/saves

Maybe you mean Gamefaqs. Not all games have it obviously, but there is a saves category for some. Here Skyrim as an example. And to search for PC games: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/pc

@worfamerryman Sorry, just saw your reply now. You can turn off it here: https://myaccount.google.com/u/0/yourdata/youtube

@peter No. As said, the recommendations was based on my subscriptions and mostly old videos from the subscriptions.

@peter I’m not actually sure if this is a privacy win at all. I use Google for years with disabled history (and other stuff disabled) and this new change does not make any difference to my privacy. At the moment, still, the home feed recommendations is mostly about videos from my subscriptions, past videos and the newest one. All it does is take away that view, which does not improve privacy. What actually improves privacy is to disable the history, which you could do since years.

Edit: I totally forgot the link I wanted to provide: https://myaccount.google.com/u/0/yourdata/youtube

@trashhalo I have the watch history disabled for years now. And the results for the home feed recommendations was more or less of content from the subscriptions I had, with a sprinkle of other content when scrolling down. Wasn’t too bad, at least better than what can be seen when logged off. But overall I don’t care if the home feed recommendations get disabled for me. Not worth trading off the watch history to Google. It’s fine for me.

There is still recommendation on the video itself, for related content. Also you can discover other channels by searching or with third party sites sites (where it gets shared). There is plenty of opportunities to discover new content. I personally rely and use mostly the Subscriptions feed view with my 137 subscriptions.

Edit: https://myaccount.google.com/u/0/yourdata/youtube

@soyagi I use YouTube mainly with Subscription (137) view anyway, with disabled history. I’m fine.

@soyagi For 1 Euros or Dollars, you can’t be mad at it.