To quote one of their posts directly: “I view people as more tools than anything, and I’m working on being nicer. I say this with 100% honesty, not because I’m being mean. I still feel like I deserve friends, though.”. They also post about calling their basketball teammates useless and about hiding behind other players so they aren’t actually open to receive passes (but somehow this is a failure of the team’s strategy?)
If it’s a real person, then I wouldn’t necessarily call them malicious but definitely lacking in empathy. But I’m leaning more towards it being a troll.
One caveat with the food tip is that eating absolute garbage like highly processed frozen food is still gonna be cheaper. I guess it’s cause they put so much preservatives and so those have such a long shelf life. Not that I’m advocating for eating that but cooking for yourself is a cheap way to eat something nutritious. But as somebody who’s gone through the same grind, it’s still honestly just cheaper to eat garbage. But, I legitimately just feel better, think better, and overall am better on food I cook myself. And that improvement has knock on effects for the rest of everything you do in life.
They mean “makers,” the kind of people into making using a variety of technologies including but not limited to woodworking, 3D printing, metalworking, leatherworking. Not usually all at once, but sometimes all at once. Incidentally you can rent a “maker space” which is just a physical space with tools to make things. Also, I think they meant CCP (Chinese Communist party).
I don’t necessarily take issue with the app just for being an app, and it hasn’t come out yet so not like taking issue with it now would be particularly meaningful. If it ends up being worse than the website that’d suck. If they end up making decisions that make the website worse to drive more people to the app, that’d suck too. Though these aren’t things I necessarily think will happen, but I’ve definitely seen it happen way more often than I’d like with websites that go on to create apps. I do think that thinking it’s just “an additional option” is a bit naïve since development resources would go into maintaining it and so naturally there would be an incentive for it to justify that. I just don’t know what form that is, it could just be as benign as “more people will use it if there’s an app.”
Somewhat vague but I think of it as “this doesn’t belong here.” It seems to be the most fitting - something could not belong because it’s irrelevant, or because it’s rude, or because nobody wants to see it. All up to interpretation, I suppose, but better that than a hard rule than I either don’t feel good about sometimes or that prevents me from downvoting things that probably should be downvoted but don’t explicitly break that rule.
How is everyone here indexing and cataloguing 10s of TBs of data???
I have like <8 TB combined probably if you count everything I have on my PC/laptop/cloud storage and I often can’t find shit and a bunch of those are full disk compressed backups that I can’t even search directly without opening it in a specialized program.
I think in that case the “forced” centralisation is purely constructed. There are no mechanisms preventing somebody from creating an android community in their own instance and federating it with lemmy.world. Even if !android@lemmy.world is permanently locked, that fact isn’t really a barrier to entry for another android community to pop up, just that that community was able to establish a subscriber base over time but I don’t see why another android community couldn’t do the same given some time, especially if the available android communities at the moment are locked and restricted.
But the reason it’s based on address is because the person you vote for has power over that location. In this system, what would that person have power over?