Thatâs incredibly condescending.
Her primary intent is to create a âsafe spaceâ for affected individuals. What is a safe space except a place where one can be protected from that which they fear? Most instances have rules against bigotry and such, but she is much more aggressive than other admins. Defederating an entire instance based on one boost of one fairly innocuous news article, defederating a mainstream news source that folks can still access outside of .art, it all seems like theater designed to make the users feel coddled, but at the expense of stepping on so many othersâ toes. Is this style of moderation really effective for these users in protecting them? Well, for their sakes, I hope so. I hope itâs worth all the drama.
Why is it so hard to understand?
Who is the one thatâs being closed-minded, here? You keep saying this and make no attempt to understand the answers I am giving you, so this will be my last reply.
Mastodon is a social network thatâs designed to be eerily similar to Twitter, and Twitter came first (and definitely pre-dates MuskâŚplease donât imply that I want Mastodon to turn into Muskâs X or 4chan). The Fediverse is still new to many, if not most, people. If the aim of the mastodon.art instance isnât close to the average use case for Mastodon, perhaps the domain name is misleading. Administrative actions can hurt peopleâs feelings, too. We are all humanâŚat least those of us that arenât bots!
Edit: You are right, my replies were mostly about me and my reaction to the drama she started. I donât pretend otherwise. I donât claim to be one of the âgood onesâ, I only said I am human, have feelings, and did not break any of her rules. Do I have a fragile ego? Perhaps! But you are putting so many words in my mouth that I did not say. I am here responding to your initial statement that you canât understand why a commenter might be upset by the .art adminâs actions.
Upon further reflection, I may have been harsh with that term. I was angry, and you successfully trolled me. I did not appreciate being called a child, or petulant or entitled, for that matter.
As I said, though, she is free to run her instance how she wants. I do feel bad for the folks that feel they need her protection, as they are living in fear, although I suppose thatâs their choice. The fact that she blocked even BBC added a dimension to my understanding of what sort of instance she is after.
I still do not agree with her methods of indiscriminately blocking 2 levels of relationships (if you can even call it that) from one person, though. To me, personally, this approach seems too likely to cause offense. If I were trying to make that type of instance, Iâd probably just start with limited federation mode, and federate only approved servers. That way itâs a positive process for including one, and there would be much less reason to call myself a nickname like Tiny Tyrant or Stabby Stabby.
Anyway, I suppose Iâm still getting used to the Fediverse and what sorts of interactions that come from it. Iâve accepted the situation now.
Not for you to decide whatâs racist and whatâs not.
Itâs not for you to decide what I can decide. I am just as much within my right to judge as she is. Itâs her that made the initial judgment, and itâs her thatâs abusing power punishing people 2 layers removed from the party in question (edit), not me.
But accept that not everybody want to share their toys with children from a sandbox thatâs misbehaving.
Get outta here. Not everyone in the instance is misbehaving.___
Iâm personally a bit upset because, as a user on firefish.social, I am getting punished for doing nothing wrong. Now I wonât be able to interact with mastodon.art users, for what? I spent a bit of time digging, and the evidence this is all based on is weak at best. A person trolled (not even clearly in a racist way, sorry), and the Firefish dev/firefish.social admin happened to boost a news article posted by the once-troll, and now all the rest of the users of the Firefish instance are defederated? What kind of logic is that? It absolutely is offensive.
Plus, how she went about it is just wrong. Rather than reaching out to the Firefish dev, she publicly shames him and announces the defederation. The result was so much drama.
Look, sure, the .art admin can run their instance how they want, and theyâre absolutely free to go about that in a way that offends people, but donât tell me I canât or shouldnât be offended.
There are other Firefish instances, though, in case one wants to use Firefish and also federate with mastodon.art.