The only way to fit generative bots into the philosophical framework of copyright

but you’re wrong about the philosophical framework of copyright.

But if creativity is rewarded with only starvation, creativity will go away, so copyright exists as a compromise to try and ensure there is food in the bellies of artists

no. it exists to stop 18th century london print shops from breaking each others’ knees, and subsequently has been expanded to continue to serve the interests of industry.

theft removes the original. copying is not theft.

arguing with people isn’t malicious.

they could have actually said something on the topic instead of trying to cast me as some kind of malicious actor. or they could have just moved along instead of attacking me personally.

baby, i’m an anarchist.

this is just posturing and rhetoric. i don’t think it’s appropriate for this community.

your insults don’t undermine anything i’ve said. you’re only telling on yourself.

is this an appeal to ridicule?

yes.

i don’t tell you what to do.

they’re not engaging with what I’m saying.

djdarren beat you to it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons#Criticism

keep scrolling

this does not prove it’s not capitalist propaganda. (it is).

the “tragedy of the commons”. People would overuse public land to graze their animals. Nobody took care of the public land or refrained from grazing to allow the grass to grow back, so it sucked.

this is a capitalist myth. the british peasantry maintained the commons until capitalist interests enclosed them.

me too

imho it’s fine to copy it here but i’d prefer if you scrubbed all references to its origin including usernames.

i don’t have reactionary hobbies.

you haven’t explained what you tihnk i’ve done that’s reactionary. this is just libel.