Dude who does stuff. Also allegedly an IT professional.
Google, unlike many of their competitors, doesnāt support display out on the Pixel. (Maybe to incentive people to use Chromecast?) I originally thought this was a feature they had and then removed, but apparently they actually never had it at all. Either way maybe weāll see Apple do some impressive things with the PD on their implementation⦠Or add a lint filter to it ;)
I have not and would not deny that, for the time, lightning was a hell of a lot better than micro USB and whatever other shit we had going on. That said, itās missing a lot of must-have modern features that myself (and others who need > USB 2 transfer speeds) would need. Type C is a mess, but Iām not to be convinced that Apple isnāt more than capable of implementing it in a manner which offers a far better experience than what lightning is offering now. Either way, the deed seems to be done and Apple appears to be gearing up to offer Type C. I can only hope that they can do so in such a manner as to push other smartphone manufacturers to up the ante as well (looking at Google with its crippled Type C implementation on the Pixel.)
I donāt know, but given the apparent volume of people having this issue Iām starting to think I might just have a special talent. Maybe my case is getting in the way?
Edit: okay I actually went and shined a light in my Pixel 7 Proās port. It has the tiniest bit of dust build-up but nothing thatās prevented my charger from working properly. Unfortunately, my speaker grills have not been so lucky.
Also have you never had lint get into a phone connector in your pocket?
No.
Huh? Why in the world would you be doing that? And shoddy? Haha dude, usb 2 ran the world fine fora decade and continues to work fine today. Lightning supports up to USB 3 anyway, but USB C came out and they didnāt bother expanding their cable selection.
Because some people actually use their iPhone to record videos, since the iPhone has a pretty damn good video camera. Iāll just link this excerpt from Mac Address that I hinted at before.
No need to worry about whether the cable youāre using supports PD, bidirectionality, hdmi, etc. All lightning cables are the same. Power and data.
USB C is a mess, sure. But if your solution to that is to try and justify sticking with an old, proprietary standard that supports only a fraction of the features of the competitor, then I guess itās your money to burn.
lightning doesnāt get junk in the ports
How the heck are you getting gunk in your USB C ports? š¤Ø
for the time
Indeed, it was probably fine ten years ago. But, as Mac Address (among many others) rightly pointed out, transferring gigabytes of HD video over a shoddy USB 2.0 line is a less-than-ideal experience.
way easier to use than usb c
How?
Remember that this is Apple, the company which has already been crippling its phones with lightning for the past decade(?). Although youāre probably right about them just going with whatever and then marketing the crap out of it.
As for ditching all physical ports, I was honestly thinking thatād probably be the road theyād go just to spite the EU. Oh well, I guess thereās always next gen?
For Firefox Iām moreso concerned about performance issues that Iāve run into with certain sites, as well as apprehension surrounding Mozilla (though Google is DEFINITELY not any better). Extension syncing (and general setting syncing, for that matter) mostly comes into play when I try to use something like LibreWolf or Ungoogled Chromium. I love the latter, but itās painful to have to manually sync my extension changes across devices. At least I can do bookmarks with xBrowserSync, but Iām SoL for everything else. š