When it comes to spreading disinformation about climate change or the risks of smoking, I can clearly see how it protects economic interests (e.g. the value of the assets of the fossil fuel industry or the tobacco industry). I therefore understand that these lies are (have been) regularly pushed by people who do not necessarily believe in them.
But what are the strategic considerations behind the active spread of anti-vax theories? Who gains from this? Is it just an effective topic to rile up a political base? Because it hits people right in the feels? Is it just a way to bring people together on one topic, in order to use that political base for other purposes?
Or is anti-vax disinformation really only pushed by people who believe it?
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy š
If your post meets the following criteria, itās welcome here!
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
It sows distrust in authority, so that those people will listen to fringe voices. These fringe voices tend to be grifters, scamming the rubes.
Politically itās a binary issue, no room for compromise. If youāre anti-vax, youāre voting for the Republican candidate, despite what the other guy might be offering. So, this locks in votes and also plays into the long term strategy of having an uneducated underclass incapable of critical thinking. This provides cannon fodder for the politicians, and low paid drones for the fat cats.
Yes, I see. So by now, one way for the Republican party to gain votes is to spread anti-vax disinformation.
And their followers gobble it up!
Usually, a lot of people who are anti-vaxx are selling something as well, like books or food supplements.
Politically, if people are mistrustful of medicine, theyāll be more likely to be mistrustful of government action in general.
So that could be one explanation why it tends to be boosted by people who have an interest in a weak government.
It is also a reason why Democrats have become a lot more hostile to anti-vaxx views.
i find the anti vax stuff is because some people genuinely believe its dangerous and was pushed too fast because of money and corporate sponsors (yet those people arent against capitalism just against when capitalism doesnāt serve them)
yet a lot of the claims of myocarditis and whatever is largely unsupported by studies and currently the anti vax folks are just going waiting for a source to say theyre correct because if i want to counter antivax i show any study theyre claiming exists
they cant show studies becuase low n behold they dont exist and facebook was lying. shocker
It has popped up organically my whole life, presumably from a lack of trust of pharmaceutical companies and government health agencies. Some risks of certain vaccines have been overvalued by the population and spread. Then there is the inorganic spread which has value on an intranational level. āIf my rival is largely antivax Iām at an advantageā etc
Itās just another way hostile foreign governments (Chinese, Russian etc.) insert chaotic propaganda to exploit and widen divisions within democracies. Some influencers work as agents of these governments, while many more are using it as an opportunity to increase their own celebrity which in turn fattens their wallets.
From my viewpoint (central Canada, urban) people do not like to be controlled and mandated. So many fought back through any means necessary. That includes denial, fear mongering and trying to discredit science and fact to avoid having to stay home, social distance, and get a needle (which many people have phobias of).
Personally I think there are cultures of distrust built up by the government as an authority they have to overcome.
The methods of testing and developing these vaccines are radically different than previous vaccines. And the qualifiers of who was āat riskā and would need them were basically wide open from a government messaging standpoint.
So people naturally looked at it with skepticism. It then became a political battle. And medical officials did not do themselves any favors by making certain assertions using the same authority that turned out not to be true.
For example the initial reports of the origin of the virus being from a infectious disease lab in Wuhan, China were vehemently denied and shot down. Even those with a history of more liberal stances like John Stewart were shouted down and lampooned. The reality was they had no authority or information to based their denial of those assertions and low and behold it blew up in their face.
And hereās the thing. Even if their messaging was altruistic there have been vaccines in the past that made clearance and the. Weāre recalled after testing because of side effects not found in testing. So thereās a history there. And the companies creating these vaccines have a history of covering up bad effects if it hits their bottoms line, such as the J&J aspiring or the talcum powder/baby power recalls. And thatās not to mention the history of testing on underserved communities that werenāt fully disclosed (ie:tuskeegee).
So yeha, it would make sense that thereās some new virus we have never seen and suddenly some miracle cure comes out within weeks, and thereās a huge media blitz for everyone, even those in good health witb relatively little risk factors, HAVE to get it. There was no nuance and again, while the push may have been altruistic the history shows there little that will help when the side effects emerge. And ājust trust us weāre scientistsā isnt enough.
Look at what happened with 9/11 cleanup crews. They have huge rates of cancer and such for cleaning those buildings up and now none of them can get treatment or even recognized that itās a cause. Another thing Mr. Stewart goes nuts on.
So the doubt of the claims, to me, was and still is justified.
āAnd the companies creating these vaccines have a history of covering up bad effectsā
Just wanted to highlight this. Astroturfing happens. Itās even more effective when youāve been in the market a long while and have friends in high places in other organizations.
Then you should hopefully limit your distrust to Covid and not extend the same to Measles vaccine.
I was talking specifically of covid vaccinations. Conflating the way covid was pitched and the reasonable doubt people had with it, and attributing the same label you to to those that questions other vaccinations is itās own issue.
Measles is one of the oldest vaccines out there. Thereās generations of data on its efficacy.
I have been labeled anti-vax because I expressed doubts about the Covid-19 vaccine. And thatās not an accurate depiction of my stance, or of the medical decisions I made for myself and my family both during the pandemic and since (or before for that matter). In fact we required family to get tdap boosters to see my premature daughter back in the early 2010s because of pertussis and the specific risks to newborns, especially premature kids. And I couldnāt bring her home because I had a fever at the end of her multi-week NICU stay.
It might be controversial, but I think people have legitimate reasons to not trust public health authorities. They have had to fess up in the past after years of misleading people about a number of things, from tobacco, sugar, alcohol, cannabis, ⦠The Spanish flu is only called āSpanishā because Spain was the only country willing to acknowledge it during war time. It didnāt help also that more recently, the White House admitted to lying about the lack of need of face masks at the very beginning of the COVID pandemic, because they didnāt want people to take them away from hospital workers who needed them.
So with that, I understand why people will want to be selective about what public health guidelines theyāll choose to trust and not trus.
Add to that, that getting a vaccine shot is unpleasant. And consoling your baby after they got vaccinated is even more unpleasant. From there, you can understand the mental shortcut that some people make, choosing to ignore the proven impressive track record of vaccines to limit or even eradicate contagion of some diseases, and all of a sudden, all vaccines are a lie.
Not only that, but this whole thing has become a hot-button issue, and any time that happens, all logic and scientific facts are the first thing to go.
For example, there are people that are allergic to certain vaccines. That is a fact. They are a small amount of the population, but they do exist, and they will die or get really sick if they get whatever vaccine.
Try telling that to someone who blindly follows the mediaās crushing message of āAll vaccines are good. Anyone who doesnāt get a vaccine is a stupid, poor redneckā They will not be able to hear it. They will think youāre anti-vaxx.
I actually got perma-banned from a subreddit for expressing my opinions on this.
Some people get downright hostile about anti-vax ideology. However I think there is some cause for concern there. Keep in mind just getting an injection regardless of whatās in it carries some risk. I donāt see any economic or political motivation behind anti-vax ideology other than a legitimate concern for public safety. No doubt thereās economic motivation for pro-vax ideology.
Some may take anti-vax ideology to an extreme, but then some may be too trusting of the system. There are wide opinions about many of the systems we live under, not just vaccination. Iām less trusting of all the systems that make up our society more than Iāve ever been. Thereās a number of reasons I feel that way. The main reason is I simply donāt trust our leaders and institutions to make public safety a priority. I mean how many times do they have to demonstrate this before the average person gets the memo.
Does your distrust also include peer reviewed science?
Less so than other institutions that are driven by corporate profits. However, the scientific community is not devoid of corruption either. You can find a scientist to say whatever you want with the right paycheck, happens all the time.
One thing I havenāt seen mentioned here yet is that at least in America, we have had a historic problem with minority groups (especially Black people) and distrust of the medical field in general thatās pretty freaking justified. This study speaks about it in depth. but hereās some relevant points from the abstract:
For some people it is a real, deep distrust in the government. Like I said though, itās justified. You donāt have to look far to see examples of what theyāre talking about. J. Marion Sims was hailed as a medical hero for developing new surgical techniques, but he practiced and developed them on non consenting black slave women and immigrant Irish women. Thatās by far from the worst though, if youāve never read of it, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study is fucking horrifying.
The men were initially told that the experiment was only going to last six months, but it was extended to 40 years.[5] After funding for treatment was lost, the study was continued without informing the men that they would never be treated. None of the infected men were treated with penicillin despite the fact that, by 1947, the antibiotic was widely available and had become the standard treatment for syphilis.[13]
The study continued, under numerous Public Health Service supervisors, until 1972, when a leak to the press resulted in its termination on November 16 of that year.[14] By then, 28 patients had died directly from syphilis, 100 died from complications related to syphilis, 40 of the patientsā wives were infected with syphilis, and 19 children were born with congenital syphilis.[15]
This study kept uneducated, rural black people from receiving adequate care for their known Syphilis infections for TWENTY FIVE YEARS after we knew about how to treat the disease. People were infected. Children were infected. People died from this study.
For background, Iām very pro-vaccine, so much so that I wanted to study biomedical sciences and immunology. But I think itās extremely important to realize the sociological backgrounds as to why some people distrust the system and are suspicious of āfree medical careā especially when sponsored by the government. The first study I linked talks about it, and I definitely agree that there is SO much work to be done in the US around trust in public health institutions.
A little conspiracy theory that I made up myself is that pharmaceutical companies spread the antivax-theories themselves, to prevent the measles from going extinct like smallpox.
That sounds mad! Good work though. Do you believe it?
deleted by creator