I would say most people are good. However, the human brain is pretty shit and easy to manipulate. It’s easy to make people view other people as not human or other to them, or to not think about them at all. Maybe that is “not good” in some definitions though. When face-to-face, I will bet every time on someone treating someone well. I’ll lose the bet occasionally, but I’ll be right more than wrong.
One thing to know about FromSoft games if you ever try again is they really want you to pay attention. They don’t baby you with telling you what to do, but there are hints all around. For the bird on the bridge you can use fire for a ton of damage (molotovs are dropped by enemies in the area). I’m pretty sure item descriptions tell you, but also it tells you in the environment. In the street going towards that bridge there’s a beast tied to a post that’s being burned, for example.
The games really aren’t that hard (except Sekiro), but they do ask you to participate. You have a lot of options to make them easier though, like using their weaknesses that are normally told to you, or summoning other players, or leveling up, or many other tools.
The grind and particularly the inventory management make me never want to play Subnautica games again despite loving the first one. I hope they sort this out for the next game in this style if they do it again. The base needs to have a shared inventory that it pulls from when crafting, and preferably stacks of items are shown instead of individual items.
That said, I don’t know if they’ll do another survival game again. They made Natural Selection before it (which is awesome and still has a community) and have made Moonbreaker now. They tend to jump around to a ton of different styles of games.
The big draw for me is that it’s modular and easily repairable. If you crack the screen, the battery life gets worse, or whatever else, you can replace it without too much issue. With the relative stop of phones getting better over the years (not saying they need to either, because they do everything that I want and way more, which is mostly just browsing the internet/Lemmy) I’m much more looking for something I can just use for many years instead of replacing every year or two.
It’s pretty damn polished. There’s just a lot of possibilities and they rarely mess up. With biggest Act 3 issue is performance is worse, which is expected when you’re going from wilderness to dense city. It still runs pretty fine on my old PC on ultra. It’s about 25fps, which for top down strategy is fine. I could lower graphics if it were an issue.
I’m aware. I was giving another example that has been used by other philosophers, but I can’t remember who off the top of my head. It just doesn’t seem useful to me. It seems more like a way to continue using the word for nostalgic reasons but without the meaning we know the word to have. It isn’t wrong by any means, it just muddies the water of what is being discussed.
God is pretty much universally known to refer to a being. Using it to refer to a non-being, to me, seems to be a purposeful attempt to not have to accept the challenges to the concept but continue on with what you believed anyway.
You can say certain ones don’t exist based on contradictions in their own scriptures, but it could just be that that version is just flawed, but there’s a core of something that does. Anyway, yeah. I agree. Anti-theist doesn’t really make sense as a position to hold. Holding any logical stance that a thing doesn’t exist is pretty much impossible from a human perspective. There’s so much were incapable of knowing.
Yeah, in a “God is the fundamental aspect of humanity” (whatever you decide that is, but often described as love or something similar), sure. That isn’t what people normally refer to, nor does it actually really mean anything at all. If I call an apple a rock, does that really mean anything? Sure, it can be my understanding of it and it isn’t wrong, but it also isn’t useful.
Just curious, but why not?
I don’t believe God or an afterlife doesn’t exist, I just don’t believe it does. Personally, I feel it’s a lot more reasonable to not assume anything until there’s a reason to, and what does assume there’s an afterlife do for me in life besides make me try to live a certain way to get in? I already try to be a good person without that need.
This is something that’s really hard for me. I’m against corn subsidies because I’m tired of everything having corn/corn syrup because it’s so cheap. I think the subsidies should be based on something else that promotes variety, and also favors sustainable farming instead of monocropping with petroleum based fertilizer. I know it needs subsidized, because people are price sensitive, but it needs to be done differently.
It could be many things, but I’d guess it’s just someone who thinks it’s cool to have matte black everything. I had a neighbor (who was a cop) who really liked matte black vehicles. It’s not like it’s illegal or anything. (Although, being a cop, he very well may have been a drug dealer also, so who knows?)
Ironically (though it’s hard to tell) I think their profile picture may be Hypocrites.