Have strong opinions, but I welcome any civil fact-based disscussion.
Old account: /u/BrikoX@vlemmy.net
Alt accounts:
You can ask your homeserver admin to add a moderation bot https://github.com/matrix-org/mjolnir that makes moderation a lot easier or if you host your own homeserver you can set it up yourself.
Not sure why artists are brought up here
It was brought up in the original post.
<…> may even go straight to the AI model since that’s distributed cheaply or even free.
Isn’t that part of the capitalism artists love so much? People will go with the cheapest option that meet their criteria. So that just validates my point where someone who wouldn’t have hired an artist now has an option, while those that prefer better quality will still hire artists.
It is highly discouraging for artists who have worked hard to hone their craft, only to have people think that their works have little difference or even a mimicry (don’t underestimate misinformation).
Easily disprovable and while I can understand the concern it’s just another medium affected by general polarization. Again AI is just shining a light on the issue not creating it.
There has been many instances where such training was done without the knowledge of the artist.
And that is the legal question that wasn’t answered yet. But the cat is out of the bag. The models are alreday trained and a lot of them are open source so there is no possible way to remove them. Interested groups should have lobbied for laws to protect from it 5-8 years ago when the tech was starting to develop. But people ignore issues until it affects them directly.
Imagine just waking up one day, and finding that there’s someone or something that can very closely reproduce your works, one’s you’ve taken many years of practice to produce, of which its quality is almost unique to yourself.
Isn’t that how artists learn by making copies of someone else’s work?
Saying that AI is not intended to replace artists, but to improve accessibility, is like saying ATMs weren’t meant to replace bank tellers.
Apples vs oranges. One is creative process while other is not. Going to 10 different artists will get me 10 different results while going to 10 bank tellers will get me the same result every time.
The way I see it AI is not replacing artists, it’s expanding access. People who didn’t hire an artist before, now can use an AI tool to generate something to add value to their creation (if they didn’t hire it in the first place, it’s not replaced anyone). And people who hired artists for originality and creativity will continue to do so. Biggest part of why someone hires an artist is the creative process and their ability to come up with the ideas.
The copyright was broken long before AI became mainstream, AI just shines a bright light on it. The only thing I’m afraid of is that whatever changes to the laws will be made will make it worse for consumers not better.
As far as I can tell mods are swift in dealing with reports. And even though the rule exists there will always be people that ignore those rules. There is no way to block whole instances at the moment and without the NSFW flag, there is no technical way to see that the post contains NSFW image.
In addition to reporting the post in question you could also block the user if you suspect that they are posting without the NSFW flag regularly.
lemmynsfw.com has a hard rule that all NSFW posts should be marked as NSFW. Report the post in question and instance admins or community moderators will deal with it. It shouldn’t be a common issue.
Not an official implementation, but there were extensive talks about it and someone was working on a plugin.
https://github.com/cheeaun/awesome-hacker-news#android
It’s really a personal preference. Try them and see which one fits you the best.